The Olympic ceromony black negitive, not mentioning slavery.
No files uploaded
I was at my friends house with several black people, and a huge debate started.
Where was slavery mentioned? As they started it off at 1920's at the beginning of the industrial age. My friends was in up rage that slavery was completely ignored and made a point of saying, how did England get rich to start the industrial age. They did point out to me the wind rush age of the west Indians were shown, but was of little importance or consolation since they missed slavery out.
Are they right?
Whats your opinion?
So yes while I agree an Olympics ceremony isn't the right forum to address the dark parts of a nation's history, I would argue it is better to show no history than to skip over/whitewash facts.
So, yes. It is a philosophy. not a race. Whoopi Goldberg is possibly the most famous jew because the myth that there is no such thing as a black jew was put into place when important scrolls were stolen from Egypt depicting something totally different and destroyed. The most famous sect to date are the Ethiopian Falashas or beta Israelites. They are a worldwide black jewish group but you'll not hear that unless you do research.
2.Reparations monetarily for the spectacle of slavery will never happen. Parliament was lobbied three years ago by a black caucus which included Dianne abbott. and Keith vaz with the intent of taking the government to task over their reticence to reimburse the black community financially for the atrocities that were levelled against us because of slavery.
At the time Tony Blair promised that a commission would be set up to address the issue. To date nothing has ever happened. That speaks for itself.
The term anti-semitic is a term coined by europeans who weren't even around when the principle religion was created. To date there are 21 different judaic factions currently on the world's religious stage. A large percentage of the various factions are coloured. That is to say of a ethnic make up. Do we ever hear about them saying that they feel persecuted in any way because of their beliefs. No.
And I'm assuming that when you say jews you are talking primarily of european jews. If that's the case that would probably be the reason for the confusion. Ask yourself. Why are we only hearing from one section of the judaic community when there are many many other judaic sects that aren't speaking out. makes you wonder.
In short. Various faiths down through the years have claimed persecution against them when they have a hidden agenda.
So the original jews are African. Though down through the years we have been fed the theory through history books,religious paraphernalia and the like that it was Europe that created all of the major religions. What you see today is a vague representation of what the original religion was really all about.
Dr Ben Jochannan details all of what I have just said perefctly in his book. Like so many things that have been doctored to hide the truth, the branch of judaism you refer to (that you see today) was specifically designed for purposes not all-together religious in content. So when you talk about . race. semites and jews. You have to make a differentiation as judaism in the present day is not built around race,but around a dilution of its real roots.It is essentially a philosophy (a spiritual philosophy) whose content has been diluted though has its roots in Africa.
Social scientists say that race is based upon your biological ethnic origin.So what we are really looking at here is not religion as a race but as a philosophy. I am more likely to be persecuted for the colour of my skin than my religious beliefs as no one is going to know my religious leanings until I open my mouth.